Nelsonfoto Forums
May 24, 2012, 02:46:10 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: SMF - Just Installed!
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: How did I do?  (Read 714 times)
Andre Reinders
EI, EI, Oh!
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 764


View Profile WWW Email
« on: April 29, 2009, 06:43:48 PM »

Now, I usually get good feedback from my photos, our photo club has a monthly themed projected images, and an open web based competition. I usually do well in the web competition. This month my flowers placed 9th and my little waterfall was not in the top 12 - out of 18. I was surprised, can you give me some feedback? I thought the flowers were not as good as the waterfall.....



Logged

André
_____________________________________
Image Musings  and  Light of Day
Julio1fer
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 3845


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1 on: May 01, 2009, 06:58:00 PM »

Andre, I like both of them. The waterfall is quite surprising (although maybe a shorter exposure would have given a more natural effect). The flowers show delicate colors and a strong diagonal line which gives movement to the picture.

I have no idea of what the competition was, but maybe people were just looking for something else. In any case, don't worry too much about ratings. Just shoot for your client, or for yourself. As we say down here, everyone else is wood.
« Last Edit: May 01, 2009, 07:00:28 PM by Julio1fer » Logged
Andre Reinders
EI, EI, Oh!
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 764


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #2 on: May 03, 2009, 08:56:36 AM »

Thanks for the comments - the competition was an open themed, web based one, that we run monthly for our photo club. I usually do well, and was surprised because I thought the shots were half-decent. Also, there are some months where the club's talent really shines though in the entries - I didn't think this was one of those months Wink
So I expected to do better - oh well, just wanted another perspective to see if I was missing something.

I am not worried in the least. I like the photos, esp the BW one. Smiley
Logged

André
_____________________________________
Image Musings  and  Light of Day
JohnR
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 538


View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: May 03, 2009, 09:48:17 AM »

Yes, the waterfall is very nice.
Logged
radiophoto
Curmudgeon-in-Training
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 4041


View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: May 03, 2009, 01:30:48 PM »

Andre, I love the texture you've got in the waterfall rocks -- but I think a shorter exposure time for the waterfall itself might have been more effective.  It loses its essential waterness and appears to be more mist-like.

Pete
Logged

Pete (Corpus Christi, TX)
Every professional should remain always in his heart an amateur. - Alfred Eisenstaedt (1898-1995)
My Website
jtzordon
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 1288


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: May 03, 2009, 01:49:54 PM »

Both are technically fine, but compositionally they feel a little too tightly framed for me.  The flowers seem like you were trying to squeeze everything in one frame.  The waterfall doesn't give me any sense of context.
Logged

-Jason

Check out my rangefinder project at http://jason-rfproject.blogspot.com/

and photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/jasonthomas/
Andre Reinders
EI, EI, Oh!
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 764


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #6 on: May 03, 2009, 05:06:10 PM »

Thanks for the comments - I usually frame tight - so I am not surprised that was mentioned.

I am one of those who like the long exposure waterfalls, maybe I will play with shortening the exposure a bit - bust just a little Wink

Thanks!!
Logged

André
_____________________________________
Image Musings  and  Light of Day
Glenn Thoreson
The old grouch
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 6725


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: May 04, 2009, 11:33:15 AM »

Andre, I like your waterfall, but it could use a few changes in technique. I think a little fill light to open up the black behind the water would help. Just a hint of detail,is all. I think the trend in moving water photos is changing to a more natural look. A faster shutter speed to get those drops hanging and give a little detail to the water would be nice. I don't think stopping the action entirely is the answer.
Logged

Glenn from Wyoming

"I reject your reallity and substitute my own"
( Adam Savage )
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!