Nelsonfoto Forums
May 24, 2012, 04:02:43 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: SMF - Just Installed!
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
Author Topic: Streaks on Negative - Leica II  (Read 1984 times)
Wayne
Bottom feeder
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 3246


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #15 on: August 13, 2009, 07:39:54 PM »

That's pretty much what I was thinking too Jorn. I don't know much about focal plane shutters though, so I'll be interested to hear the outcome of this.
Logged

Wayne

Flickr
Santiago Montenegro
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 1212


View Profile Email
« Reply #16 on: August 14, 2009, 06:51:52 AM »

Jorn, I misspent hours and hours thinking about that, and never found an answer. As you know, my current anti-Leica stance forbids me for giving it any more thought  :cool:

But I do feel that "capping" is not the proper term here, and I use it for lack of a better one. Real capping would cause unexposed areas in the film. In my case, I first looked at grit or irregularities at the leading edge of the curtains-at no avail. And thinking about it, the streaks only appeared at higher speeds. What cured it was getting the shutter to work cleanly. Or plain good luck, you never know. 
Logged
LarryD
Karma is Real
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 11382


View Profile Email
« Reply #17 on: August 14, 2009, 06:55:32 AM »

Quote
As you know, my current anti-Leica stance forbids me for giving it any more thought  cool

 I like that thought.
Logged

Film photography and the Soviet Union are not dead. Just downsized.
jake
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 8511


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: August 14, 2009, 07:44:43 AM »

Plus the more time the film is exposed to the light, the lighter the area on the film will be. So the dark streaks actually indicate a reduction in exposure to light in those areas, not an increase as would be the case in a light leak. What I might accept is if the light leaks in an erratic but speedy shutter somehow resulted in nearly proper exposure in the areas of the leaks  while the non-leaky areas of the shutter resulted in the typical dark areas associated with capping, albeit in streaks (sort of like dodging/burning a print with your hand while spreading your fingers.)

Still doesn't make a lot of sense though. If you have a repair done and it involves replacing the shutter curtains, it would be interesting to see what the old curtains look like.

Edit: It occurs to me that the streaks could occur when the two edges of the shutter curtain were very close to each other - too close as in touching or nearly touching each other (or nearly overlapping or whatever.) The streaks would then be where the two edges either touch or overlap, while the clear areas would be where space occurs. This would be caused by the leading curtain lagging and the following curtain catching up with it as they pass across the film gate. To continue with the hand analogy, this would be like holding two fingers together and having light pass between them due to the irregularity in the shape of your two fingers. Make sense?
Logged

LarryD
Karma is Real
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 11382


View Profile Email
« Reply #19 on: August 14, 2009, 07:53:52 AM »

I think we are all over thinking this.... Let it get a good CLA and then after the photoiopsy / Autopsy we shall know. LOO
Logged

Film photography and the Soviet Union are not dead. Just downsized.
Santiago Montenegro
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 1212


View Profile Email
« Reply #20 on: August 14, 2009, 08:12:11 AM »

It occurs to me that the streaks could occur when the two edges of the shutter curtain were very close to each other - too close as in touching or nearly touching each other (or nearly overlapping or whatever.) The streaks would then be where the two edges either touch or overlap, while the clear areas would be where space occurs. This would be caused by the leading curtain lagging and the following curtain catching up with it as they pass across the film gate. To continue with the hand analogy, this would be like holding two fingers together and having light pass between them due to the irregularity in the shape of your two fingers. Make sense?

Makes perfect sense, and amounts to "partial capping" or "almost capping", if you will. What bothers me is the fact that the streaks are so thin... Nah, I am starting to see how they could be so thin: a kind of vibration when the second curtain catches up with the leading one, so contact is made only in tiny points and during milisecs... yeah, that could be it.
Logged
joho35mm
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 763


View Profile Email
« Reply #21 on: August 20, 2009, 10:59:40 AM »

The camera is on its way to Youxin. I'll keep you all updated on the results.
Logged
JRJacobs
I'm NOT drunk!
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 1527


View Profile Email
« Reply #22 on: August 23, 2009, 11:45:53 AM »

I don't understand this.

The indoor shots were taken at the same speed as the outdoor ones?

Then if it is "capping", shouldn't the streaks show up in all the photos?


Logged
joho35mm
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 763


View Profile Email
« Reply #23 on: August 23, 2009, 09:15:25 PM »

Yes, the indoor photos were also taken at 1/500. Youxin tells me that the shutter "was not opening completely" at 1/500 and "running unevenly." He did not opt for a curtain replacement, however, and just CLA'd the shutter (and also cleaned out the rest of the camera and the RF/VF). I guess he knows better than I do. I'll be reshooting a test roll once the camera is back, so we'll see what how things turn out.

I do have to vouch for Youxin's friendliness and professionalism in this repair case. After a very amiable set of back and forth conversations, I sent the camera to him. He notified me as soon as it arrived, repaired it within two days, and mailed the camera back to me with an email kindly saying that I could pay him after I got the package! This really seems to confirm the extensive praise he gets on other photo sites. If the repair job fixes the problem, I'm completely sold.
« Last Edit: August 23, 2009, 09:17:21 PM by joho35mm » Logged
LarryD
Karma is Real
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 11382


View Profile Email
« Reply #24 on: August 23, 2009, 09:19:13 PM »

A true professional. So sure of his work that he did that and trusted you... or did he? LOL
Logged

Film photography and the Soviet Union are not dead. Just downsized.
Mike Kovacs
Knutty butt nice
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 7087


View Profile Email
« Reply #25 on: August 24, 2009, 08:34:54 AM »

Don't worry, he's installed a remote self destruct inside the camera in case the person doesn't pay :p
Logged

jake
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 8511


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: August 25, 2009, 05:30:09 AM »

Quote
The indoor shots were taken at the same speed as the outdoor ones?

Yes, but the light may not arrive on the film from the same focused direction indoors. Equivalent but diffuse light levels indoors may not have shown the issue, while intense light at a particular angle from the sun did.

Let us know how it works out!
Logged

Santiago Montenegro
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 1212


View Profile Email
« Reply #27 on: August 25, 2009, 07:25:45 AM »

Quote
The indoor shots were taken at the same speed as the outdoor ones?

Yes, but the light may not arrive on the film from the same focused direction indoors. Equivalent but diffuse light levels indoors may not have shown the issue, while intense light at a particular angle from the sun did.

Let us know how it works out!

Exactly! Mine only did it at the beach.
Logged
joho35mm
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 763


View Profile Email
« Reply #28 on: August 25, 2009, 07:43:17 PM »

I'm out of town at the moment, and won't be able to test the camera until next week, but it seems like Youxin even ran a test roll through it before he sent it back! He wrote in our most recent correspondence that "the stripes should gone.  I saw those clearly before CLA the camera and they were all gone after CLA."
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!