Okay, you've been warned. As an engineer (as least in a past life), I know the value (and potential lack thereof) of qualitative tests. But here's one that interests me.
I recently acquired a couple of really nice old LSM lenses - an uncoated 1939 Summitar 50/f2 and a Nikkor 35/f2.5. Dennis has been after me to show some "glow" (please don't get upset, it's an inside joke - at least I'm not talking bokeh). Anyway, here are some samples, all shot on a Lumix GF1 (2x crop), no post-processing:
Nikkor 35/f2.5 LSM:

Full size (big)
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4040/4372885117_e297be6e62_o.jpgLeica Summitar 50/f2 uncoated:

Full size (big)
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2689/4372885987_fec85fd968_o.jpg

and, for comparison to the latest technology, the Lumix 20/f1.7:

Full size (big)
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2795/4372889619_efe7a1ca87_o.jpgClearly not the technical winner (in contrast and sharpness), I love that little Summitar.
The detail from the Lumix lens is incredible. Click on the magnifier on the full size images, and compare the eyes.
Reed