Nelsonfoto Forums
May 24, 2012, 08:56:20 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Established 2005
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: new 6x17 pinhole camera: first outing  (Read 555 times)
jtzordon
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 1288


View Profile Email
« on: July 09, 2011, 11:53:09 AM »

I've just tested my new 6x17 pinhole camera. This is the first camera I've made for roll film. I'm really happy with how the camera turned out. My woodworking is definitely getting a lot better! The main issue I had was getting the stain right. This camera was really the first thing I've spent time on finishing; I've learned a ton about staining and oiling along the way. The camera is not yet complete as I'm in the process of oiling the shutter and new lower profile knobs. I also installed some felt around the back to block off a light leak that shows up between frames.


P1020100 by jason_in_gboro, on Flickr


P1020102 by jason_in_gboro, on Flickr

And my test shot:


120test by jason_in_gboro, on Flickr
« Last Edit: July 11, 2011, 12:18:27 PM by jtzordon » Logged

-Jason

Check out my rangefinder project at http://jason-rfproject.blogspot.com/

and photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/jasonthomas/
br1078lum
PFMcFarland
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 2165

Waiting for the light


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: July 09, 2011, 07:14:42 PM »

A beautiful camera, with wonderful results.  Good work, Jason!

PF
Logged

Smile, it won't kill you
P C Headland
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 2705


View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: July 10, 2011, 03:34:52 AM »

Looking good.

Out of curiosity, what made you settle on 6x17?
Logged

Paul H: In the land of the long white cloud

Galleries: Fotopic (dead) | Flickr | minus
jtzordon
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 1288


View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: July 10, 2011, 08:20:35 AM »

Thanks guys!

Out of curiosity, what made you settle on 6x17?

I really like a panoramic format, but haven't shot one but for a few outings with a paper negative pinhole camera a few years back. The camera just became a pain to use, so I didn't end up shooting it much. I initially thought I'd do something like 6x24; I'm not sure why I decided against that. Smiley I started the build to be more like 6x18, but placed my film rails such that the outer edges made it 6x18, so the image is slightly smaller.

Oh, and here's a photo of the inside for anyone interested.


P1020101 by jason_in_gboro, on Flickr
« Last Edit: July 11, 2011, 12:17:56 PM by jtzordon » Logged

-Jason

Check out my rangefinder project at http://jason-rfproject.blogspot.com/

and photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/jasonthomas/
jtzordon
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 1288


View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: July 11, 2011, 12:16:45 PM »

Here are my shots from my first outing with my new pinhole camera (http://www.f295.org/Pinholeforum/forum/Blah.pl?m-1310236557/). Evidently the shutter is in the frame, so my frame size after cropping ends up being about 6x15. Still not bad, but I'm going to try to figure something out to minimize the problem. Another thing that I've found is that the first frame is really hard to advance. The spool makes too big of an angle to the rail on the first frame, so there's quite a bit of rubbing. You can tell if you zoom in to shot 1. I'll probably add some clear tape to try to reduce the friction. Ah well, the things you learn from a first build...


1 by jason_in_gboro, on Flickr


2 by jason_in_gboro, on Flickr


3 by jason_in_gboro, on Flickr


4 by jason_in_gboro, on Flickr
Logged

-Jason

Check out my rangefinder project at http://jason-rfproject.blogspot.com/

and photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/jasonthomas/
shadowfox
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 2065


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: July 11, 2011, 03:02:57 PM »

No other words quite describe it other than "awesome"
Logged

Julio1fer
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 3845


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #6 on: July 11, 2011, 05:32:31 PM »

I am nonplussed by what people do here with pinholes. I could not do it with good glass.

Must get an old box camera somewhere to modify and start pinholing. Maybe it's in the hole after all.
Logged
jtzordon
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 1288


View Profile Email
« Reply #7 on: July 11, 2011, 06:19:57 PM »

You gotta go wide if you're going to pinhole. :cool:
Logged

-Jason

Check out my rangefinder project at http://jason-rfproject.blogspot.com/

and photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/jasonthomas/
Julio1fer
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 3845


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #8 on: July 11, 2011, 06:56:53 PM »

Hmmm., yes you are right. Maybe I can start with a body cap in a standard 35mm camera. Just looking for the shortest path to Pinholand.
Logged
NancyB
The Love
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 1794


View Profile Email
« Reply #9 on: July 12, 2011, 04:08:11 PM »

Jason, these are beautiful, but I really love the second shot in the second set of pictures, the one of the pond. 
Logged

Look and think before opening the shutter. The heart and mind are the true lens of the camera.
- Yousuf Karsh
P C Headland
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 2705


View Profile Email
« Reply #10 on: July 13, 2011, 02:46:10 AM »

They look scarily sharp for a pinhole, and the compositions are well suited to the pinhole camera too.
Logged

Paul H: In the land of the long white cloud

Galleries: Fotopic (dead) | Flickr | minus
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!