Nelsonfoto Forums
May 25, 2012, 06:46:47 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Learn All You Can. Share All You Learn.
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Noise overblowing on pictures on Facebook  (Read 257 times)
Philip
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 1063


View Profile Email
« on: January 20, 2012, 06:08:32 AM »

This may be the wrong place to ask -- I don't think many of my Nelsonfoto friends are as into "noising up" pictures as I am from time to time.  I do it sometimes to make an image into what I want, adding Gaussian noise to areas of the photograph that may be distracting, leaving central subjects unnoised.  Sometimes I use noise to hide gaffes or joins, or whatever.   All in the interest of a final image. Smiley

Sometimes I post such selectively noised pictures to Facebook and discover that -- unlike other sites like Flickr or Nelsonfoto -- something in the way Facebook displays photos increases tiny levels of noise into sand-blasted sections.  What may be unnoticeable noise in what I send to Facebook becomes really over-the-top abrasion both in photo "albums" and in mail messages.

I suppose I could do trial and error to see what the threshhold of noise would be for each photo I post to Facebook, but it would be nice to know what Facebook's problem is and avoid it altogether.  Uhh, without having to avoid Facebook itself (that's a different story altogether...).

Has anyone else had this problem with Facebook? 


Philip
Logged

Using whichever camera is handy. Now showing at Flickr or   at Flickriver
br1078lum
PFMcFarland
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 2167

Waiting for the light


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: January 20, 2012, 10:26:58 AM »

Can't help you there, Philip, as I don't do Facebook since I left the museum.

PF
Logged

Smile, it won't kill you
Major Black
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 2892


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #2 on: January 20, 2012, 09:20:21 PM »

Philip, I've noticed that FB seems to over-saturate. For a while I would do a desaturated, FB version of pix. Haven't had too much of a problem lately.

God knows what they're doing- but it's ugly.
 :mad:

« Last Edit: January 22, 2012, 07:48:57 PM by Major Black » Logged

Philip
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 1063


View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: January 21, 2012, 07:27:17 AM »

Probably that's it -- I wonder if, along with that oversaturation, they are adding a sharpening algorithm, one that conflicts with my PSP's Gaussian noise.
Logged

Using whichever camera is handy. Now showing at Flickr or   at Flickriver
Major Black
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 2892


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #4 on: January 22, 2012, 07:51:41 PM »

Philip, I think that may be the case as well. They assume that their users post crappy snapshots and so they "fix" them.
Logged

Philip
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 1063


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: January 28, 2012, 10:52:46 AM »

Sigh. One man's fix-up is another man's, uhhh, well, you know.
Logged

Using whichever camera is handy. Now showing at Flickr or   at Flickriver
LarryD
Karma is Real
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 11394


View Profile Email
« Reply #6 on: January 28, 2012, 12:52:08 PM »

Philip

 Flickr was doing that and changed it when they were getting too many complaints.
Logged

Film photography and the Soviet Union are not dead. Just downsized.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!