Missed it by [-] that much

[mdcarma]

Both are 1971 versions, but definitely classics.

[nelsonfoto]

Why hello there, pretty girls!

[nelsonfoto]

They're plenty "classic" for this joint, BTW.

[mdcarma]

But Craig, they were so stinkin' cheap I had to give them a new home.

[nelsonfoto]

I know the sickness. I know it well.

[Dean Williams]

Flagships, stern to stern.  Neat.

[Mike Kovacs]

I had a Nikon F, same year, identical to that one on the left.

[Peter Evans]

I gots a Canon F-1, pretty much identical to the one on the right. A well-designed, solid camera. I didn't use it at all for about a decade (what with all these new-old-fangled "rangefinder" alternatives), rediscovered it, felt pity for it, dry-fired it a couple of dozen times, liked the feeling, dry-fired it a couple of hundred times more during commuter train rides, loaded it up, and it worked beautifully. Then I bought an 85/1.2 for it. Yummy! (As long as it's in my hands. Hanging off a shoulder, the combination is painful.)

[mdcarma]

I take these out in a pair.  If I only tote one I walk with a pronounced list to starboard.