Nelsonfoto Forums
May 25, 2012, 03:38:55 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Welcome to Nelson Foto Forums!
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Who makes a decent changing bag?  (Read 691 times)
nelsonfoto
Administrator
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 3353


View Profile
« on: September 03, 2005, 05:46:55 PM »

Perusing eBay for a good-but-affordable changing bag - any ideas?
Logged
mdcarma
delusions of adequacy
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 1884


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: September 03, 2005, 06:47:14 PM »

Tell your lovely bride to keep that shirt down. :mrgreen:

Logged
Glenn Thoreson
The old grouch
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 6723


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: September 03, 2005, 09:00:33 PM »

Craig, if compactness is not a big issue, look for one of those dark boxes the mini-labs use. Much more pleasant to work with. They be listed in the darkroom equipment section on the 'bay and often are pretty durn cheep.
Logged

Glenn from Wyoming

"I reject your reallity and substitute my own"
( Adam Savage )
sandeha
Retired Pirate
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 3525


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #3 on: September 03, 2005, 11:19:53 PM »

Try a Konica.  Come in three sizes, I think - bigger is better.  Look out for a giant lampshade frame to bend into shape and stuff inside.
Logged

ImageMaker
B&W Geek
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 5990


View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: September 04, 2005, 08:06:05 AM »

I don't know that there's a bunch of difference in brands, nor do I know what brand mine is -- but it's the biggest size that doesn't have a frame or rigid box.  I've been doing everything in it, including measuring and cutting film strips to load Minolta 16 cassettes, for the past couple years; I can't/won't do processes in it that call for liquids, but otherwise it's been good enough for anything I've wanted to do.

Now I have a darkroom available (takes a few minutes to block the window, is all), so I can do all my film loading on a flat surface, and it's a little easier, but not much so (the counter is a little lower than I'd like).  Biggest thing is, I have the option to do stuff in trays, or drop a reel of film into a tank already filled with developer (though I haven't even noticed fill time being a big issue).  Secondary, a film slitter is a LOT easier to use on a flat surface than in a bag, but that's only an issue if you shoot odd formats like 16 mm.
Logged

Never let yourself spend 25 years away from the darkroom...
connealy
call me mike
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 3192


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #5 on: September 04, 2005, 08:21:57 AM »

What kind of film slitter are you using to make the 16mm?
Logged

nelsonfoto
Administrator
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 3353


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: September 04, 2005, 09:03:34 AM »

I think I have a good line on a box. Thanks, guys.
Logged
mdcarma
delusions of adequacy
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 1884


View Profile Email
« Reply #7 on: September 04, 2005, 10:04:50 AM »

Oh, sorry Craig.  My girlfriend just got a job (yippee) managing a Motherhood & Maternity store.  

I'm surprised, I guess I do listen when she talks.  :mrgreen:
Logged
ImageMaker
B&W Geek
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 5990


View Profile Email
« Reply #8 on: September 04, 2005, 07:07:12 PM »

Mike, I'm not using a slitter yet.  I do plan to make one soon, as I'd really rather be able to shoot faster film than the microfilms I've been using in my Minoltas for the past couple years.  Most likely I'll build up a spool-to-spool flatbed type to cut four equal strips from 120 (15.25 mm wide, close enough), and come up with a way to divide those strips exactly in half; that will get me eight strips a few inches shorter than a standard Minolta 16 film (standard is 18 inches; I routinely get 25 exposures on 21 inches).  With careful loading and a good watch on the counter, there's no reason one couldn't shoot right to the end of the film and get 20 shots on a 15 inch strip.  That would make a Minolta 16 roll of Pro 100 cost about 16 cents, and I could shoot it at EI 200 easily enough without anything more exotic then Diafine -- even in HC-110, I can get EI 200 with pretty good shadow detail using my high dilution, low agitation, long soak routine.  If I need more speed, I could go as high as EI 1600 with semi-acceptable grain using Tri-X and Diafine...
Logged

Never let yourself spend 25 years away from the darkroom...
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!