Nelsonfoto Forums
May 25, 2012, 08:09:38 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Learn All You Can. Share All You Learn.
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Looking for a cheap wide angle in M42  (Read 361 times)
Alan Gage
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 1691


View Profile Email
« on: June 11, 2006, 03:57:00 PM »

Hey all,

Since I got my DSLR I haven't really missed my wide angles. I never seemed to be able to use them all that well anyway and usually preferred more of the normal look. There are a couple things now though that I want to do that I just can't do without a pretty wide lens.

Since these ideas usually don't pan out and I then end up with an expensive piece of equipment I don't use I'm looking for a cheap way to get some decent wide angle shots. I know the russians made some in M42 mount that were pretty cheap but decent and I think that's what I might be looking for. I'm thinking somewhere around 16mm but when I look on Ebay all I seem to find are fisheye lenses.

Anyone got any ideas out there? Or maybe one they'd want to part with?

Thanks,

Alan
Logged

My travel blog while I'm on the road- http://www.alangage.blogspot.com
Wimpler
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 773


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: June 11, 2006, 04:31:39 PM »

I think picking up any 28mm f2.8 for 15$ and using it on a film camera would be a lot easier.

No lens wider as 28mm will be cheap, as far as I know.
Logged
josphy
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 1171


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #2 on: June 11, 2006, 04:59:03 PM »

Maybe 20mm?  You can get a Russian Mir 20 for about $100 or less.
Logged

Alan Gage
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 1691


View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: June 11, 2006, 05:27:45 PM »

I don't think a 20mm is going to be wide enough. I've got a 24mm and that doesn't quite cut it. I wonder how one of those 16mm fisheyes would look on a DSLR considering the image will be cropped from the center, maybe not so exagerated and they're under $150 new (including shipping).

As for shooting film; I thought about it for a while. But the truth is I really have no desire at all to shoot 35mm film anymore.

Thanks,

Alan
Logged

My travel blog while I'm on the road- http://www.alangage.blogspot.com
josphy
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 1171


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #4 on: June 11, 2006, 06:01:11 PM »

Oh I totally spaced out.  I only read m42, and I didn't even see you were planning to mount it to a DSLR.

http://bobatkins.com/photography/reviews/fisheye.html

Look towards the bottom, and he's got a pic of the Zenitar 16mm used with a DSLR.  I think that lens is a full-frame fisheye, not the circular type of image anyway.
Logged

Alan Gage
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 1691


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: June 11, 2006, 06:08:13 PM »

Excellent, thanks Josphy. That's the lens I've been looking at. I'll have to do a little more research; but I get the feeling I'll end up with one for those "once in a while" situations. Hard to go wrong for the price and could probably come close to breaking even if I decided to sell it.

Alan
Logged

My travel blog while I'm on the road- http://www.alangage.blogspot.com
Alan Gage
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 1691


View Profile Email
« Reply #6 on: June 11, 2006, 08:21:02 PM »

Well, the deed is done. Now awaiting my package from Russia.

Found one on Ebay (new lens) that came in Pentax K mount with automatic diaphragm so no adapters and no stop down metering. Under $150 shipped and I couldn't pass it up.

What was that I said in another thread about not spending money anymore? Guess it's time to make one more pass through my cameras and find some more stuff to sell.

Alan
Logged

My travel blog while I'm on the road- http://www.alangage.blogspot.com
josphy
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 1171


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #7 on: June 11, 2006, 08:31:42 PM »

If I were you, I'd still be tempted to mount it on a film SLR for some superwide craziness.  Just once at least.  But on your DSLR it should be about 24mm I guess, which is my favorite wide-angle.  I had a zoom that went to 20mm, but that was really almost too wide for a lot of situations.
Logged

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!