Nelsonfoto Forums
May 25, 2012, 08:41:59 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Learn All You Can. Share All You Learn.
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
Author Topic: The 'un-love' of b/w  (Read 1106 times)
Jadedoto
Frequent Contributor
***
Posts: 178

Jadedoto
View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #15 on: July 11, 2006, 11:21:59 AM »

I've tried TMY in D76, Ilfosol S, Xtol and I still can't get it to work out. I've shot it at different speeds, developed in different agitations/times/dilutions, and I am just about ready to kick it out the door. Not to mention I think the grain structure in Tab films is disgusting, once you get it visible. And when it's not there, it just seems to punchy and contrasty and sharp.

I love APX 100 though... and Tri-X. Can't go wrong with those.
Logged
Don Day
O frabjous day!
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 1578


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #16 on: July 11, 2006, 11:24:42 AM »

I've been using the JandC Efke 70mm film to reload my 1A cameras, but had been pretty unhappy with the consistently low contrast I was getting with D-76, which has been my mainstay for other films. I tried a batch using HC110 dilution H at about 11 minutes, and Wow! I got the snap and range I had been missing all along with D-76.  I'll reset now to the combination that works.  Go figure.
Logged

_Don Day /_Light of Day_
wlewisiii
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 1392


View Profile Email
« Reply #17 on: July 11, 2006, 07:43:27 PM »

Interesting thread. I dislike all of the modern grain films I've tried (Tmax, Delta, etc). That's mostly due to using Diafine 90% of the time (a bit of D-76 once in awhile) and frankly Diafine doesn't play well with those films. An old classic grain film like Plus-X, FP4, Fomapan 100 will sing in it though, so I'm happy to use them instead.

William
Logged

Heck, just give me a Tessar on any camera :cloud9:
"I beg to dream and differ from the hollow lies..." Green Day
LarryD
Karma is Real
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 11395


View Profile Email
« Reply #18 on: July 12, 2006, 04:14:04 AM »

TMZ in Diafine looks like mud. I want to soup my next roll in HC-110

Larry
Logged

Film photography and the Soviet Union are not dead. Just downsized.
ImageMaker
B&W Geek
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 5990


View Profile Email
« Reply #19 on: July 12, 2006, 07:12:29 AM »

Diafine seems generally not to work very well on T-grain and delta-grain films.  No idea why...
Logged

Never let yourself spend 25 years away from the darkroom...
titrisol
Will work for film!!
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 991

FORTRANIZER!

titrisol
View Profile Email
« Reply #20 on: July 12, 2006, 09:09:50 AM »

BUT Rodinal seems to work great Wink

Me guesses it is because of the size distribution of the grains, diafine develops them all more or less equally, and the grain size is the same, thus muddy look.

Quote from: ImageMaker
Diafine seems generally not to work very well on T-grain and delta-grain films.  No idea why...
Logged

If you can't fix it with a hammer... you got an electrical problem
My Flickr
r-brian
Misplaced Hokie
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 1156


View Profile Email
« Reply #21 on: July 12, 2006, 12:00:07 PM »

That's funny.  I kinda of like TMax 100, EI 160, in Diafine.

This was shot with a FED 3, 35mm Jupiter, with yellow filter



I also like TMax 100 in Rodinal and just developed some 4x5 Tmax 100 with DiXactol.  They look really nice.

Just developed a roll of Foma 100 in DiXactol and got nice green stained negatives.  I thought I read somewhere that Foma has a blue base.  Combine that with light brown stain and I got green.  No DiXactol for Foma.

Brian
Logged

"photography is a process of saying 'no' most of the time so that you can say 'yes' with an exclamation mark a few times"  Frans Lanting
josphy
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 1171


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #22 on: July 13, 2006, 08:23:51 PM »

Amazing how opinions differ, but I don't like TMX in Diafine at all.  It's the only film I've tried in it that I didn't like.  The grain just got weird.  That was when I had a conventional darkroom.  Not sure how it would look scanned, but I definitely think that makes a difference.

I thought TMX was okay in Rodinal and actually pretty nice in Microdol, but after using one 100' roll of it, I decided I didn't like it enough to go for another.
Logged

LarryD
Karma is Real
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 11395


View Profile Email
« Reply #23 on: July 13, 2006, 08:55:13 PM »

TMZ was the worst in Diafine. I wish there was still a High Speed regular grain film like the old Kodak Recording film.

I would post a scan of the TMZ in Diafine at 1200 but I threw it away it was not worth keeping. And it would hardely scan I wet printed a few and after an hour gave up.

Larry
Logged

Film photography and the Soviet Union are not dead. Just downsized.
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!