I dunno. Meanwhile, I'll laugh a lot. 

All are beautiful, but the last one is a classic.

It is crazy how kids so small can now experiment with photography. Tadeo's taken oner his mom's tablet, and spends quite a bit of time making self portraits, and then editing them.

Some can be artsy:





Some are, hmmm, "interesting":





And then some are just disgusting, unless you happen to find them, as I do, gut-bustingly funny:

HB and many happy returns, Les! Looking good!

Dan, buen camino!

So I am getting confident. Let's try just laying the Minox negative accross the flatbed and be done with it:


110004 by Santiago Montenegro, on Flickr

Edited to bust some dust

A random Minox neg, not the sharpest one to begin with:


110003 by Santiago Montenegro, on Flickr

The lack of  Newton rings was the best surprise for me. I scanned two whole strips with zero rings. Microscope slides must be VERY good at anti Newt.

Today I'll try some Minox negatives and post results. With the good news from Mike, maybe 110 wasn't dead after all!

I have "discovered" that you can scan 110 in a flatbed just by laying the negative bellow a microscope glass slide. Won't win any sharpness contests, but it is usable. Used, dirty glass slide and incredibly dusty negative bellow. And yes, vintage digital in the picture  



110002 by Santiago Montenegro, on Flickr

 

BTW, neither of us is pregnant, it's just the camera angle...

Dan, please tell my namesake that I my heart is not ready yet for the walk. Maybe next year will be the year I've been longing, and I will be able to make the  pilgrimage too.

And rest assured, the bidder is paying only for the Biogon. You're just throwing in the camera and Soviet lenses 

Great set. Loved the strange sky.

Please, Pete, modify the auction title and say right there that there's a 21mm Biogon included in the package. You can thank me later.   That lens alone is worth no less than 600 bucks.