Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 272
|
|
1
|
Gearheads / the Classics / Re: Retina II from Texas
|
on: May 24, 2013, 04:32:49 PM
|
|
Thanks Larry, PF and Pete. Of course, Pete, this one came from the photo lab. The body was perfect, just the bellows were a bit rusty and the lens had some dust, all of this to be expected.
The wrist strap could be a solution, if you are on travel or street situations. It is a small camera although heavy by current standards. I tend to carry my classics in a pouch or bag, along with film. light meter, viewfinders, auxiliary lenses or whatever. I usually take away all the cases and straps, to avoid tangling.
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
Gearheads / the Classics / Re: Retina II from Texas
|
on: May 19, 2013, 01:40:21 PM
|
Thanks for the comments, Mike! Whatever became of the camera that you shared with your brother? My father traded or sold that Retina II, with our full consent. We were not using it very much. The Retina was just an old boring camera to us, not yet a classic. In the mid 1960s, SLRs, Canonets, half frames and even 16mm were in, folders were out. Just a few months later, I got a used Zenit 3M which stayed with me for 30 years. But that is another story altogether. With the Retinas, I've always found it a bit tricky to comfortably grasp the camera, because the lens door blocks much of the front of the camera where you would hold it with your right hand. I've tried everything from using my folded middle finger resting against the lens door to a backward "C" pinch using my thumb and middle finger with my index finger for the shutter release. You are right! I just pile my folded fingers against the open lens door and release with the right index. Folder ergonomics were not stellar.
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
Gearheads / the Classics / Retina II from Texas
|
on: May 18, 2013, 07:33:40 AM
|
This is the Retina II I got from Pete in Texas, after going through the CLA and bellows repair (it took three test rolls to nail the leak):   The first "serious" camera I ever owned, 50% with my brother when I was 10, was one of these. We received the camera from my father, along with a barrage of instructions to consider it as a precision instrument, take care of it, etc. We never took any memorable picture with it, but we did many family and friends pictures and documented a few school and high school trips. I last used the Retina II in 1967, to document a trip to Porto Alegre, Brazil. Handling one again after all those years was interesting. It is one of the most compact classics I know that has a rangefinder and a high quality lens - the Xenon is excellent. Controls and operation are simple, provided you don't do flash. The only thing you must remember is to set focus to infinity before folding. Of all the rangefinder Retinas with bellows, I find that the II is the best combination of portability, lens quality and ergonomics, for the subjects I shoot. Enough talk, some from the test roll. First one is amateur fishermen in International Labor Day (May 1st, for you Americans).  The posh Casino Carrasco (in the back side of Sofitel hotel Carrasco)  Close view of the fountain piece (is this how you look when you get out of the Casino?)  And the usual boat pictures, no test roll is complete without them. Small fishing boat,  and the pilot launches against the sun, to test the Xenon flare behavior.  Thanks for looking! Film was TMX developed in Beutler mix. Any other member is fond of the Retina II?
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
Gearheads / the Classics / Re: Kiev IV AM
|
on: May 16, 2013, 06:11:07 PM
|
|
Great lenses, at least in my examples. Every one is better than the M39 versions I have.
Helios-103 is one of the finest 50mm I have used.
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
Gearheads / the Classics / Re: Solinar and MF
|
on: May 07, 2013, 06:09:01 PM
|
|
Phil, I am not sure. IIRC there were different sets of lenses and shutters for the Record III (and the II and...). Mine has a Synchro-Compur, 1 second to 1/500 + B.
I believe that the Record and Viking series were close twins. My shutter/lens may have come from a Viking, because focusing distances are marked in feet.
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
Gearheads / the Classics / Re: Solinar and MF
|
on: May 06, 2013, 06:30:22 PM
|
Good point about rangefinder in ft - will check the old auction site. A unique camera with swapped lens/shutter and new bellows deserve a picture in this thread, don't you think? (hint ... hint..) Of course...how could I have forgotten! Here it is, the one on the right, some years ago. You can see the "wind film" indicator next to the release. The other twin is an Ansco Viking - old Hagar, which later got snatched in Hawaii by an ex-member, while completing a world tour.  I miss the traveling cameras.
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
Gearheads / the Classics / Solinar and MF
|
on: May 05, 2013, 07:44:03 AM
|
My old Agfa Billy Record III bellows were leaking light like a sieve. Thanks to Sandeha's craft I got a replacement bellows. The Billy has a Solinar mounted. It has a story - the camera belonged to my father, it originally had an Agnar triplet. But at one point something broke in the shutter, and he got it replaced with a Solinar that a friend brought from Germany. I had not used this camera for a long time. In the test roll of HP5+ (BTW, my first time with Ilfotec DDX), I was impressed. Look at this frame shot at 1/250, f/16 (I know, f/16 is easy for any lens):  and this crop (scanned at 1200 dpi, unsharp masked):  You can just see the grain in the sky, in the crop. The definition of the negative still has plenty of room! The scale in the lens is in feet. I am ashamed, because I ruined several nice portraits in this test roll by doing a wrong conversion from my auxiliary rangefinder, which is calibrated in meters. Shoot and learn.
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
General / The Eyes Have It | W/NW / Re: Pilgrimage to Santiago de Compostela
|
on: May 02, 2013, 06:34:44 PM
|
|
Take care of your knees and Annie's, Dan, it is a very long way, and you want to get to Santiago in good shape!
You are travelling through historic places. Carrion is the place of the Infantes that campaigned with the Cid, and IIRC later cheated on him.
Don't worry about posting photos, there will be time later on. We will all keep tuned!
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
Gearheads / the Classics / Re: Exakta Varex IIb
|
on: May 02, 2013, 06:27:26 PM
|
|
I had not checked this thread. Ron, that's some equipment you got there! Angenieux, no less! Very nice portraits BTW.
Thanks, Mike -- this is my first contact with an Exakta. Still have to get used to the differences. For instance, the slow speeds are still a mistery to be unveiled, although I do have a manual.
|
|
|
|
|