Nelsonfoto Forums
May 21, 2013, 05:22:03 PM
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News
:
Established 2005
Home
Help
Login
Register
Nelsonfoto Forums
>
Dude, I'm Geekin' Out Over Here!
>
Critiquing Forum
>
Path to the light
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
Print
Author
Topic: Path to the light (Read 456 times)
miztli
Frequent Contributor
Posts: 150
Path to the light
«
on:
June 08, 2007, 01:41:27 PM »
I will appreciate your comments for the following picture
Picture was taken with a Super Ikomat C camera with a 105mm Tessar lens
Thanks
«
Last Edit: June 08, 2007, 01:45:44 PM by miztli
»
Logged
Moises in Guadalajara
ImageMaker
B&W Geek
Prolific Poster
Posts: 5990
Path to the light
«
Reply #1 on:
June 08, 2007, 02:36:47 PM »
I'd like to see more DOF in it; it looks like it was front-focused instead of hyperfocal (as it would pretty much need to be for the depth in the scene), but there's no distinct subject that would call for the focus being at the nearest plane of what's in view. It seems a little soft overall, too, but that might be a scanning artifact; a Tessar should certainly be capable of more sharpness in the plane of focus. I'd also be tempted to burn the upper right corner a bit, if there's anything on the negative to bring in (i.e. if it wouldn't just show as a dead gray after burning in).
The truncated diagonal composition does a good job of drawing the eye into the scene, though, and then the elliptical shape made by the dark areas around the end of the visible trail helps the eye circulate and take in the details.
Logged
Never let yourself spend 25 years away from the darkroom...
Julio1fer
Prolific Poster
Posts: 4056
Path to the light
«
Reply #2 on:
June 08, 2007, 03:29:33 PM »
The composition and tonalities are nice, the elements I like most are the diagonal of the trail and the two planes of the landscape, the trail area and the soft background, well separated.
If I have to critique, I would say that the photo would be improved by a center of interest, such as cars, animals or people walking on the trail, or a foreground element. Ideally, this center of interest should be just besides the tree, since that seems to be the center of gravity of the picture.
Great work with a classic camera, nonetheless.
Logged
Pages: [
1
]
Print
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
General
-----------------------------
=> The F Stops Here
=> Making It Work For You | Business Matters
=> Photography-related | Workshops, Book Reviews, Site Reviews & Suggestions
=> The ? of it All | Photographical Belly-Button Exploration
=> The Eyes Have It | W/NW
-----------------------------
Dude, I'm Geekin' Out Over Here!
-----------------------------
=> Technical Central
=> Let there be light!
=> Nelson's Garage - The Retouch/Editing forum
=> The Modern Print & Digital Darkroom
=> Film & Darkroom
=> DIY-ing to Try Something New?
=> Critiquing Forum
-----------------------------
Gearheads
-----------------------------
=> Heads Up! Guilt-Free HU-Zone
=> Point-N-Shoot, Pinhole, Polaroid, and Plastic Emporium
=> the Classics
=> SLRs | Rangefinders | Lenses & other for both
=> Digital Dharma
=> Bigger Is Better
-----------------------------
Working Together
-----------------------------
=> Fuji Instax Tour | Home
=> Community Projects | Winter/Summer Challenges Underway!
=> Found Film & Vintage Prints
=> Global FED2 - Olga hits the road!
=> Hagar the Wandering Viking
=> Shurflash Project Archives
Loading...