Nelsonfoto Forums
May 24, 2013, 10:13:32 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Learn All You Can. Share All You Learn.
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Brownie/Brownie  (Read 490 times)
Gene M
It's funny.
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 2797


View Profile WWW Email
« on: September 02, 2006, 07:17:04 PM »

http://www.westfordcomp.com/foundfilm/browniehawkeyesept06/

Amazing !
Logged
edthened
Och ay re noo
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 1584


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1 on: September 02, 2006, 07:26:18 PM »

Och am excited................................reelie a am :cool:
Logged

A Man's a Man for a' that
Robert Burns
Captain Slack
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 898


View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: September 03, 2006, 08:27:20 AM »

Does that Brownie take 620 film?  If so, might be the reason for the name change from the Six-16.  I just opened up Brownie Target Six-16 I have and it takes... 616 film!!
Logged
connealy
call me mike
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 3192


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #3 on: September 03, 2006, 08:52:32 AM »

I'll have to confess that I get some pleasure from seeing and identifying old cameras which appear in vintage photos, books and films.  Pictures of them where they appear incidentally in the course of recording some social event seem especially nice.
 . . Pictures of photographers posing with their cameras are not quite so authentic in a sense as they are often done for publicity purposes.  Even less authentic are pictures of celebrities of one sort or another which show them wielding a camera.  There are some of both in the book I recently read by Charis Wilson.  There is one of Weston dramatically aiming his big view camera; his high-top boots and riding pants seem a bit improbable as a working outfit, but apparently he actually did wear the pith helmet both in Mexico and during the Guggenheim grant travels.  Another picture - less contrived - shows Imogen Cunningham shooting Charis with what appears to be a Rollei.  There is also a photo by Weston of the young Henry Fonda with a Leica around his neck; he brought it to the session unprompted, but Charis diplomatically omits any information as to the amount of film that Fonda put through the camera.
Logged

Julio1fer
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 4056


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #4 on: September 03, 2006, 09:32:40 AM »

Quote
Does that Brownie take 620 film?


Yes it does. I shot my first film ever (Verichrome Pan) in one of those, back in 1960. They have a very nice viewfinder, by the way, and picture quality is not bad at all.
Logged
Ben
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 1221


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #5 on: September 04, 2006, 08:08:55 PM »

I've got one on my shelf, that my Dad put a boat load of film through.  Thanks Gene
Logged
Ben
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 1221


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #6 on: September 04, 2006, 08:13:56 PM »

Mike theirs a great photo I saw at Disneyland taken in the 50's.  I've been looking for it since, but haven't found it.  Its a photo of probably 50-75 guests taking photos of the Disneyland characters.  

Is I remember you could see everything from Argus to Zeiss being used, and the print was large and sharp.

Quote from: connealy;50744
I'll have to confess that I get some pleasure from seeing and identifying old cameras which appear in vintage photos, books and films.  Pictures of them where they appear incidentally in the course of recording some social event seem especially nice.
Logged
jake
Prolific Poster
*****
Posts: 8512


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: September 04, 2006, 08:21:32 PM »

Sam and I were looking at a show in a gallery of boxing photos. The number and types of cameras ringside in these photos (from back in the day of Sonny Liston) was mouth-watering.
Logged

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!